Worked examples
What a PropertyKete report actually tells you
Each of these is a real report for a real Auckland address, generated the same way it is for any address you search — with commentary added between the sections explaining what each finding means, what it does not mean, and where it came from.
They are all civic, community or commercial properties. Everything shown is public record and the site will produce the same report for any address on request, but publishing a page about somebody’s home is a different act from a person looking up an address themselves.
Material hazard findings, and how severity differs between them
Two water findings, and why they are not the same problem
A real PropertyKete report for a civic site in Henderson, Auckland, explained finding by finding — what a flood plain and an overland flow path each mean, why they carry different urgency, and what neither of them proves.
Read the worked example →A clean result is evidence, not a guarantee
Every check came back clear. Here is what that is worth.
A real PropertyKete report for a civic site in New Lynn, Auckland, where every hazard check came back clear — and a careful reading of what that does and does not establish.
Read the worked example →Material findings, screening indicators, and planning overlays
Not all evidence is the same weight
A real PropertyKete report for a community site in Titirangi, Auckland, showing why a direct parcel-level finding and a broad regional susceptibility layer are treated — and should be read — as different kinds of evidence.
Read the worked example →A note on coverage
These examples are all in Auckland, where council hazard data is deepest. The same report runs for any New Zealand address, but outside Auckland it runs fewer checks — and says so, rather than returning a clean-looking page. See what we check in each city, or exactly what we hold and where. For where a report fits in the wider process, read how to research a property before buying.